Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Monday, June 24, 2013

Government Against the People

In the shadow of 9/11, the Bush administration developed domestic security and foreign policy that crystallized every racist and paranoid sentiment of White America. This doesn't mean that every white American is racist or paranoid. It means that the paranoid and racist beliefs inherited by White Americans, whether they subscribe to those beliefs or not, was at the forefront of policies and programs such as the no-fly list and the INS Special Registration ofAliens. The Bush Doctrine was the mea culpa since it had the international community and human rights organizations crying foul.

The election of President Obama signaled the expectation that such inherently oppressive policies would be chucked. This had less to do with Obama's party affiliation than his pedigree which is a reflection of the 1960s instead of the 1860s. In the 1860s, Americans fought over whether a person was fit to be enslaved by the virtue of skin color. In the 1960s Americans witnessed the Civil Rights Era, the British Invasion, the dawn of the hippies and a radical shift in American social norms. African-Americans moved from being an after-thought to being in the forefront of the American psyche in politics and media. 1961 is the year Barack Hussein Obama was born to a white mother and a Kenyan father. He was raised by his single mother and later by his maternal grandmother. Obama has publicly discussed his struggle in establishing his identity and core values to align with his bi-racial lineage.

In the 1960s, his bi-racial lineage was an anomaly. Today a bi-racial or mixed lineage is the norm for a majority of Americans. There is still a White America but it is blending with a America whose citizens don't trace their roots back to the Puritans. The probability of meeting a blonde, blue-eyed American today is as much, if not lower in some areas, as of meeting an American who isn't. However, the probability of seeing a blonde, blue-eyed terrorist is as low as seeing Duchess Kate take the subway in rush hour.

The Obama administration followed the previous administration's precedent by reauthorizing NSA surveillance. By extending its scope to encompass all telephonic and web activities of all Americans including press organizations, the Obama administration established a new precedent of pitting the government against the people. The unspoken acknowledgment is that America is not comprised of only blonde, blue-eyed people. There are darker colored Americans of varying lineages. The underlying message is that since blonde, blue-eyed terrorists are rare and darker colored Americans aren't, the government can expect an attack by its citizens. Therefore, instead of protecting the rights of and serving all Americans, the government must arm itself against them by searching for and finding fault with them.

Americans will start to minimize their perceived faults. If the government is looking for terrorists, then Americans will diminish any characteristic or censor any idea that smacks of terrorism. The question is what activity smacks of terrorism? Is it praying in a mosque, is it wearing a turban, is it questioning why we quietly support Saudi Arabia while refuting the legitimacy of the Iranian government, is it stating, “I don't like how America is doing as a country”? Many Americans will think they are safe from scrutiny or prosecution because of their skin color, their creed and their heritage. Many others will subscribe to ideas that are not their own but belong to a “pre-approved” set. That is an unfortunate path to follow. The tragedy is that our elected officials are the ones to direct us to it. The irony is that the first bi-racial President did nothing to stop them.


Saturday, March 9, 2013

Hypocrisy Before Fundamentalism

In Dhaka, the recent spate of bloggers questioning the existence of God and criticizing religion have touched a nerve among Bangladeshis who are predominantly Muslim and identify Islam as their creed. But before I cry 'intolerance' I cry 'hypocrisy' that is summed up in two words: Rohingya Muslims.

Rohingya Muslims are an ethnic minority group in Myanmar. And according to Amnesty International the Rohingya Muslims are the most persecuted ethnic and religious group in the world. Even before Myanmar gained statehood after WWII, there was and still is an active campaign to decimate the Rohingya Muslims and this group is fleeing to the country where they originally migrated from.

Before India gained its independence in 1947, the British Raj encouraged the exploration and settlement of current day Myanmar. The majority of the settlers migrated from the Bengal region of which Bangladesh is a part. So, apart from being Muslims, Rohingyas share ethnic and lingual roots with Bangladeshis. Rohingya Muslims also live in and around the border towns of Bangladesh and Myanmar. It's understandable that many Rohingyans would flee to Bangladesh. What's baffling is that they would face an unwelcome and hostile environment there.

Bangladeshis do not want anything to do with the Rohingya Muslims. In 2009 the government started a program to repatriate Rohingya Muslim refugees to Myanmar, effectively sending these people to their deaths. To ensure the certainty of death, Bangladesh ordered three international aid groups to stop working in the two refugee camps on the border. What are the three aid groups? Doctors Without Borders, Action Against Hunger and Muslim Aid. To flee death in Myanmar and Bangladesh, Rohingyans sail on dinghy boats to Indonesia where there is a growing settlement of Rohingya Muslims.  

In case the irony is lost, here is a bit of trivia. Bangladeshis actively seek to ensure that their children become doctors and/or marry doctors. Hunger is rampant in the metropolises across the country. If anyone knows what it is like to be hungry, it is a Bangladeshi. The last but not least, the country is densely populated with 97% of Bangladeshi's being Muslim. This is the country that is telling a group of people that is closely related to them in religion, language and ethnic background to literally die. This is the country that cannot stand disbelief of Islam and can condone the murder of people who think differently, but they have no problem in not supporting fellow Muslims.

Bangladesh's socio-econmic reasons to not adopt Rohingyans fall flat. Bangladesh's economy is supported by foreign aid, and  the political system is the most corrupt ones in the world. Adopting Rohingyans isn't going to drain the country's economy, infrastructure or resources. Whatever of these Bangladesh has, the government is squandering it anyway.

Indonesia on the other hand is a densely populated archipelago that lost out to a deadly tsunami in 2004. Indonesia has a stronger basis to deny the migration of Rohingya Muslims but the government has welcomed these refugees. 

So while Bangladeshis may quake with rage at the mere thought of the possibility of God not existing, they have yet to look at their practice of Islam in their political lives, if not their personal lives.